Headfi上JH 11 PRO與UE 11 PRO的Review出來了.
發表於 : 週四 8月 20, 2009 1:19 am原文在這.
http://www.head-fi.org/forums/f103/review-custom-iems-ue-11-pro-vs-jh-11-pro-440715/
這邊只會放出分數比較表(注意,以下分數難免主觀,請先觀看原文).想看詳細的,請至Headfi上觀看.
Scale of marks in Frequency Range . .
UE 11 PRO JH 11 PRo
High band: 8 8
Mid band: 8 9.5
Low band: 8 8.5
Breakdown:
Transparency: 8 9
Soundstage: 7 8
Stereo imaging: 8.5 9
Extension: 8 8
Impact: 8 8
Transient attack: 8 8.5
Ability to scale: 8.5 8.5
Smearing of micro-detail: 9 9.5
Efficiency: 8.5 8
Smoothness: 8 9
Speed, rhythm, and timing: 8 9.5
Decay: 8 9
Clarity: 7.5 8.5
* Mean Score: 8.1 8.5
PS:
1.推的辛辛苦苦的,還不如用底線更好
2.為什麼Headfi上總是把訂製耳道跟全罩比呢??
http://www.head-fi.org/forums/f103/review-custom-iems-ue-11-pro-vs-jh-11-pro-440715/
這邊只會放出分數比較表(注意,以下分數難免主觀,請先觀看原文).想看詳細的,請至Headfi上觀看.
Scale of marks in Frequency Range . .
UE 11 PRO JH 11 PRo
High band: 8 8
Mid band: 8 9.5
Low band: 8 8.5
Breakdown:
Transparency: 8 9
Soundstage: 7 8
Stereo imaging: 8.5 9
Extension: 8 8
Impact: 8 8
Transient attack: 8 8.5
Ability to scale: 8.5 8.5
Smearing of micro-detail: 9 9.5
Efficiency: 8.5 8
Smoothness: 8 9
Speed, rhythm, and timing: 8 9.5
Decay: 8 9
Clarity: 7.5 8.5
* Mean Score: 8.1 8.5
PS:
1.推的辛辛苦苦的,還不如用底線更好
2.為什麼Headfi上總是把訂製耳道跟全罩比呢??
