AndAudio.com

標　　題：ARCHIPEL新譜報告
發 表 人：blue97(blue97.tw)
發表時間：2001/11/06 16:58:09

Mahler
Sym.2:Klemperer/Concertgebouw.O

Bruckner
Sym.8:Knappertsbusch/Bpo ('51.1.

Bruckner
Sym.9:Knappertsbusch/Bpo ('50.1.28)

ARCHIPEL是英國低價的歷史錄音，轉錄忠實，音源的取得合法，
可惜國內沒人代理。

標　　題：Re:ARCHIPEL新譜報告
發 表 人：Huangs(metaphysicalist)
發表時間：2001/11/06 17:53:22

>※ 引述<blue97(blue97.tw)>之銘言：
>Mahler
>Sym.2:Klemperer/Concertgebouw.O
>
>Bruckner
>Sym.8:Knappertsbusch/Bpo ('51.1.
>
>Bruckner
>Sym.9:Knappertsbusch/Bpo ('50.1.28)
>
>ARCHIPEL是英國低價的歷史錄音，轉錄忠實，音源的取得合法，
>可惜國內沒人代理。

可能請 Tower 代訂嗎？

標　　題：ARCHIPEL，貝姆，布魯克納
發 表 人：blue97(blue97.tw)
發表時間：2001/12/08 01:26:46

首先我必須說，台灣應該有人去爭取ARCHIPEL的代理權，
這真是一家價格便宜，復刻技術優良的小廠。
最近他推出貝姆的布魯克納第七號，
這是老大師1948年8月的錄音，在Hunt編撰的錄音整理中記載，
過去曾被Vox、Discocorp、Intercord等廠商出版LP，
這次ARCHIPEL是世界首度CD化，
貝姆壯年期的演出，值得收藏家參考。

標　　題：Re:ARCHIPEL，貝姆，布魯克納.... How's ARCHIPEL doing?
發 表 人：deneb(ductility2002)
發表時間：2001/12/08 09:45:49

>※ 引述<blue97(blue97.tw)>之銘言：
>首先我必須說，台灣應該有人去爭取ARCHIPEL的代理權，
>這真是一家價格便宜，復刻技術優良的小廠。
>最近他推出貝姆的布魯克納第七號，
>這是老大師1948年8月的錄音，在Hunt編撰的錄音整理中記載，
>過去曾被Vox、Discocorp、Intercord等廠商出版LP，
>這次ARCHIPEL是世界首度CD化，

My experience about ARCHIPEL......I got my Furtwangler 42 Beethoven 9th from ARCHIPEL's publish.
The reason I did it is that I could not get the "nice Tahra or Melodiya publish".
SO I got to try someone which is neither "Pirated" (like Iron Needle or Monopoly) nor "had been known for not so good (like M&A)".
For what I can see in the States, the Furtwangler 42 Beethoven 9th is pubished by.....(except those I had known is "pirate")
R.C.D, Music and Arts, Arkadia, the new published Classical D'Oro and ARCHIPEL
The last one seems to be a good one to choose.....
They put Peter Ander as the cover photo instead of using Furtwangler (Mr.Anders is cute!).
After I get the CD, I found they printed on the CD with "best possible sound"
Is it real? I do not know. Because I still haven't found what I'm looking for.....(Tahra or Melodiya)
and I do not have much money to try every version I am curious.
What I feel is that the bass is not quite pure and clear as I expected.
I wonder that is this because of historical recording or because of ARCHIPEL's technique.
If any people who have listened this ARCHIPEL's, please give me some comments and comparson of other versions.

標　　題：Re:ARCHIPEL，貝姆，布魯克納.... How's ARCHIPEL doing?
發 表 人：pennimax(pennimax)
發表時間：2001/12/08 12:30:18

>※ 引述<deneb(ductility2002)>之銘言：
>If any people who have listened this ARCHIPEL's, please give me some comments and comparson of other versions.

I'm sorry that I cannot type Chinese because I'm in school now.

My only Archipel is Tristan by Suthaus/Konwitschny. As you mentioned above, the bass is not clear, and the high pitch in this set is not shrill. My opinion about their transfer is that they do not try to tamper with or manipulate the sound during their transfer. (Perhaps at the same level as Dante?)

As for various labels' Beethoven 9 , I have no idea if this Archpel is issued from the best possible "SOURCE", but I'm pretty sure its sound would be better than that of Classical D'Oro--always, always avoid this label; neither their operas(Opera D'Oro) nor historical recordings (Classical D'Oro) are well-transfered. Their transfer is a disgrace to those original tapes.

And I have only heard RCD's recording once(maybe 4 years ago?). According to my vague memory, RCD did a good job in eliminating the hiss. It sounded incredibly clear, but I'm not sure if RCD also erased something at the same time.

標　　題：關於 Archipel & Gebhardt
發 表 人：殘酷而美麗(pennimax)
發表時間：2002/03/02 05:53:17

想買 Archipel & Gebhardt 的人可以到這裡看一看：

http://www.subito-cantabile.de/
http://www.jpc.de/index_en.shtml

subito-cantabile 以歌劇歷史錄音為主，價格比較低；我上個月中在這裡訂CD，從付款到收件不到十天。JPC 賣的東西種類較多，不過價格較高。